Re: [squid-users] process load

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:22:16 +0900

On Wed, Dec 05, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> >So the expensive youtube regexp ACL will only be processed by requests
> >from clientA.
> >Requests from clientB won't ever hit the youtube ACL lookup.
> >
> >If you know how to craft ACLs then you can avoid almost all of the
> >penalties.
> >
> >Adrian
>
> Adrian! stop encouraging the regexp-addicts. :-)
>
> We're trying to wean them off the unnecessary use of slow ACL remember? ;)

its not always unnecessary! :)

Hah, then you're going to hate one of the things I might have in the pipeline
if I get time/funding - pushing some access control lookups into external
processes which only do things like regular expression processing.

Adrian

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
Received on Wed Dec 05 2007 - 22:16:28 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:00:01 MST