On Wed, Dec 05, 2007, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : Hmm.. might be a good idea to try Squid-2.HEAD. This kind of things
> : behaves a little differently there than 2.6..
>
> Alas ... I don't think i could convince my boss to get on board the idea
> of using a devel releases. then again, i'm not too clear on how
> branch/release management is done in squid ... do merges happen from
> 2.HEAD to 2.6 (in which case does 2.6.STABLE17 have the behavior you are
> refering to?) or will 2.HEAD ultimately become 2.7 once it's more stable?
Squid-2.HEAD should eventually become Squid-2.7.
> So it kind of seems like i'm out of luck right? my only option being to
> try 2.HEAD which *may* have the behavior i'm describing.
Its part and parcel with free software. We can be paid to test it in a lab
and give you a certain answer if you'd like. :)
-- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -Received on Wed Dec 05 2007 - 22:00:12 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:00:01 MST