Re: [squid-users] Transparent IPFW bypass for one host

Hello,

please, if you are writing a new post, send it as new mail and not
as reply/followup on old mail. It makes people with threading clients
angry and they can also in such case miss your e-mail.
Thank you.

On 04.01.08 13:46, jeff donovan wrote:
> Message-Id: <FD3C8A16-F565-4B48-A3D9-CCD8A20A7FD5@beth.k12.pa.us>
> From: jeff donovan <donovan@beth.k12.pa.us>
> To: squid <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> In-Reply-To: <477E7759.7060806@chtsanti.net>
> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:46:57 -0500
> References: <fllaao$1n6$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080104133643.GR12085@skywalker.creative.net.au> <fllhqo$t7q$1@ger.gmane.org> <477E7759.7060806@chtsanti.net>
> Subject: [squid-users] Transparent IPFW bypass for one host

> greetings
>
> I'm having a syntax brain fart.
> I have a transparent proxy and i need one host to bypass the redirect
> to squid.
>
> what is the correct syntax for IPFW ??

especially when this is a squid mailing list and you're asking FreeBSD
related question

> here is what i have.
>
> ipfw add 2 fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any in recv en1
>
>
> i need to add a rule that allows host 192.168.1.1 not to have port 80
> traffic redirected to squid ?
>
> TIA
>

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Your mouse has moved. Windows NT will now restart for changes to take
to take effect. [OK]