> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008, Marcus Kool wrote:
>  > I wish that the wiki for RIAD is rewritten.
>  >
>  > Companies depend on internet access and a working Squid proxy
>  > and therefore the advocated "no problem if a single disk fails"
>  > is not from today's reality.
>
>  Mirroring? no worries. RAID5? reduced performance.
>
>
>  > One should also consider the difference between
>  > simple RAID and extremely advanced RAID disk systems
>  > (i.e. EMC and other arrays).
>
>  > The external disk arrays like EMC with internal RAID5 are simply faster
>  > than a JBOD of internal disks.
>
>  Doing some more updated testing is on my todo list in June/July timeframe,
>  but the last time I checked RAID5 was still slower than a JBOD for Squid.
>  Of course, Squid taxes disk setups in ways they really aren't designed for,
>  and it doesn't do it well.
OTOH, writing over a SAN is usually nearly-instantaneous thanks to the
enormous caches those things have.
I'd like to know of anyone using a SAN for squid caches tho, and I'd
like to know what kind cost estimates they did on their setup - to me
it smells like a big money sink for no return.
-- /kinkieReceived on Tue Mar 25 2008 - 09:32:52 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 13:00:05 MDT