Re: [squid-users] performances ... again

From: Ionel GARDAIS <ionel.gardais_at_tech-advantage.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:56:22 +0200

Configured proxy for now.
I'm doing some network to see how can I use squid in transparent
interception without breaking the exclude rules ffrom the current pac we
use.

Ionel

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Configured proxy, or transparent interception?
>
>
> On fre, 2008-06-06 at 08:29 +0200, Ionel GARDAIS wrote:
>
>> DNS issues ... client side ? proxy side ?
>> clients resolve to Windows Server 2003 DNS for internal domain names.
>> These servers forward to DMZ DNS (running bind) for internal view of
>> the DNS (private IPs). DMZ DNS forward to the world for all internet
>> name resolution.
>> The squid box uses the DMZ DNS.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ionel
>>
>> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>>
>>> tor 2008-06-05 klockan 19:10 +0200 skrev GARDAIS Ionel:
>>>
>>>
>>>> After rereading my post, I saw that I did not finish a line :
>>>> "[...] cache-misses median service times are around 200ms and cache-hits are around 3ms" but we often see a 10-second lag for browser to start loading the page.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That's usually DNS issues. For example if you have two DNS servers
>>> configured where one can not resolve external names...
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Henrik
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Ionel GARDAIS
>> System-Network Engineer
>>

-- 
Ionel GARDAIS
System-Network Engineer

Received on Fri Jun 06 2008 - 06:56:29 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 06 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT