Re: [squid-users] performances ... again

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:53:23 +0200

Is there any difference if you configure the proxy explicit without
using a PAC?

Do you have any rules in the PAC depending on destinaion IP of the
requested server?

fre 2008-06-06 klockan 08:56 +0200 skrev Ionel GARDAIS:
> Configured proxy for now.
> I'm doing some network to see how can I use squid in transparent
> interception without breaking the exclude rules ffrom the current pac we
> use.
>
> Ionel
>
>
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > Configured proxy, or transparent interception?
> >
> >
> > On fre, 2008-06-06 at 08:29 +0200, Ionel GARDAIS wrote:
> >
> >> DNS issues ... client side ? proxy side ?
> >> clients resolve to Windows Server 2003 DNS for internal domain names.
> >> These servers forward to DMZ DNS (running bind) for internal view of
> >> the DNS (private IPs). DMZ DNS forward to the world for all internet
> >> name resolution.
> >> The squid box uses the DMZ DNS.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ionel
> >>
> >> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> >>
> >>> tor 2008-06-05 klockan 19:10 +0200 skrev GARDAIS Ionel:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> After rereading my post, I saw that I did not finish a line :
> >>>> "[...] cache-misses median service times are around 200ms and cache-hits are around 3ms" but we often see a 10-second lag for browser to start loading the page.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> That's usually DNS issues. For example if you have two DNS servers
> >>> configured where one can not resolve external names...
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Henrik
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Ionel GARDAIS
> >> System-Network Engineer
> >>
>
Received on Fri Jun 06 2008 - 08:53:29 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 06 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT