Re: [squid-users] Squid Scalability

From: Quin Guin <quinguin_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:50:02 -0700 (PDT)

Should I just put the records on wiki = http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks?highlight=(benchmarking) or is there a better place for this information? I can provide the data today once I know where the best places to post it is? --- On Fri, 4/3/09, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Scalability > To: "Quin Guin" <quinguin@yahoo.com> > Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Date: Friday, April 3, 2009, 12:42 PM > Quin Guin wrote: > > Hi Amos, > > > >   I am willing to supply benchmarking > data for 6 different deployments configured as forward > proxies on a regular basis. Where should I submit the > records and currently we are using 2.7, 2.6 and I should be > able to get some 3.x data as well? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Quin > > Excellent thank you. > > Email the info to squid-dev@squdi-cache.org > mailing list please. > > Amos > > > > > --- On Fri, 4/3/09, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> > wrote: > > > >> From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> > >> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Scalability > >> To: "Sunny Bhatheja" <opensource.linux4e@gmail.com> > >> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org > >> Date: Friday, April 3, 2009, 10:06 AM > >> Sunny Bhatheja wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>>       I have the > following configuration > >> of my Hardware. So can any one suggest me that how > much I > >> can scale my Squid in terms of users. > >>> 1)       Sun Fire > system > >> x4450 > >>> 2)       Quad Cord > >>> > >>> 3)       64 GB RAM > >>> > >>> 4)       146x4 GB > HDD > >>> > >>> I am using squid 2.6 STABLE4 that is bundled > with RHEL > >> 5.2 > >> > >> Despite many years of asking, few people have ever > supplied > >> the squid project with relevant benchmarking info. > We depend > >> on volunteers so there are no hard numbers > available > >> publicly yet. > >> > >> req/sec scales into thousands on modern hardware. > It > >> depends on what modes you run squid as > (forward/reverse have > >> vastly different maximums), how high the > hit-ratios are and > >> how many req/sec each user makes. > >> > >> To scale higher you will need a newer Squid than > >> 2.6.stable6. > >> > > > -- > Please be using >    Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or > 3.0.STABLE13 >    Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6 >
Received on Fri Apr 03 2009 - 12:50:14 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 03 2009 - 12:00:01 MDT