Re: [squid-users] Squid Scalability

From: Sunny Bhatheja <opensource.linux4e_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:26:24 +0530

I think it`s ok! you can put there

Quin Guin wrote:
> Should I just put the records on wiki = http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks?highlight=(benchmarking) or is there a better place for this information?
>
> I can provide the data today once I know where the best places to post it is?
>
>
>
> --- On Fri, 4/3/09, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>
>
>> From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Scalability
>> To: "Quin Guin" <quinguin_at_yahoo.com>
>> Cc: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
>> Date: Friday, April 3, 2009, 12:42 PM
>> Quin Guin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Amos,
>>>
>>> I am willing to supply benchmarking
>>>
>> data for 6 different deployments configured as forward
>> proxies on a regular basis. Where should I submit the
>> records and currently we are using 2.7, 2.6 and I should be
>> able to get some 3.x data as well?
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Quin
>>>
>> Excellent thank you.
>>
>> Email the info to squid-dev_at_squdi-cache.org
>> mailing list please.
>>
>> Amos
>>
>>
>>> --- On Fri, 4/3/09, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
>>>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Scalability
>>>> To: "Sunny Bhatheja" <opensource.linux4e_at_gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
>>>> Date: Friday, April 3, 2009, 10:06 AM
>>>> Sunny Bhatheja wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I have the
>>>>>
>> following configuration
>>
>>>> of my Hardware. So can any one suggest me that how
>>>>
>> much I
>>
>>>> can scale my Squid in terms of users.
>>>>
>>>>> 1) Sun Fire
>>>>>
>> system
>>
>>>> x4450
>>>>
>>>>> 2) Quad Cord
>>>>>
>>>>> 3) 64 GB RAM
>>>>>
>>>>> 4) 146x4 GB
>>>>>
>> HDD
>>
>>>>> I am using squid 2.6 STABLE4 that is bundled
>>>>>
>> with RHEL
>>
>>>> 5.2
>>>>
>>>> Despite many years of asking, few people have ever
>>>>
>> supplied
>>
>>>> the squid project with relevant benchmarking info.
>>>>
>> We depend
>>
>>>> on volunteers so there are no hard numbers
>>>>
>> available
>>
>>>> publicly yet.
>>>>
>>>> req/sec scales into thousands on modern hardware.
>>>>
>> It
>>
>>>> depends on what modes you run squid as
>>>>
>> (forward/reverse have
>>
>>>> vastly different maximums), how high the
>>>>
>> hit-ratios are and
>>
>>>> how many req/sec each user makes.
>>>>
>>>> To scale higher you will need a newer Squid than
>>>> 2.6.stable6.
>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>> Please be using
>> Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or
>> 3.0.STABLE13
>> Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Apr 03 2009 - 14:57:02 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 03 2009 - 12:00:01 MDT