Re: [squid-users] Squid BUG?

From: Herbert Faleiros <herbert_at_scwtelecom.com.br>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:50:35 -0300

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:58:22 +1200 (NZST), "Amos Jeffries"
<squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
[cut]
> As a side issue: know who the maintainer is for slackware? I'm trying to
> get in touch with them all.

Sorry, here Squid was build from sources. The distro maintainer and more
info (does not provide a binary Squid package) can be found here:
http://bluewhite64.com (I'm still waiting for an official 64 bits Slackware
port)

>>> does deleting the swap.state file(s) when squid is stopped fix things?

Apparently yes:

/dev/sdb1 276G 225G 37G 87% /var/cache/proxy/cache1
/dev/sdc1 276G 225G 53G 87% /var/cache/proxy/cache2
/dev/sdd1 276G 225G 37G 87% /var/cache/proxy/cache3
/dev/sde1 276G 225G 37G 87% /var/cache/proxy/cache4

It's running OK again.

Now, another strange log:

2009/04/21 00:26:25| commonUfsDirRebuildFromDirectory: Swap data buffer
length is not sane.

Should I decrease cache_dir sizes?

>> The stranger think was store rebuild reporting > 100%.
>
> Yes, we have seen a similar thing long ago in testing. I'm trying to
> remember and research what came of those. At present I'm thinking maybe
it
> had something to do with 32-bit/64-bit changes in distro build vs what
the
> cache was built with.

Similar logs found here about memory usage (via mallinfo):

Total in use: 1845425 KB 173%

and sometimes negative values:

total space in arena: -1922544 KB
Ordinary blocks: -1922682 KB 49 blks

Total in use: -1139886 KB 59%

--
Herbert
Received on Tue Apr 21 2009 - 03:50:38 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 21 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT