Re: [squid-users] 3 ISPs: Routing problem

From: RSCL Mumbai <rscl.mumbai_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:12:40 +0530

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Jeff Pang <pangj_at_arcor.de> wrote:
> RSCL Mumbai:
>
>>
>> What would like to configure is setup "specific G/ws for specific
>> clients".
>>
>> 192.168.1.100 to use G/w 192.168.1.1
>> 192.168.1.101 to use G/w 192.168.1.1
>> 192.168.1.102 to use G/w 192.168.1.2
>> 192.168.1.103 to use G/w 192.168.1.2
>> 192.168.1.104 to use G/w 192.168.1.2
>> 192.168.1.105 to use G/w 192.168.1.3
>> 192.168.1.106 to use G/w 192.168.1.3
>>

I just found out that squid is removing the marking on the packet:
This is what I am doing:

(1) I marked packets coming from 10.0.0.120 to port 80, with "mark1"
(mark1 corresponds to isp1)
(2) I added a route rule which says that all packets having mark 1
will be routed through ISP 1

But the packets are not routing via ISP1

When I disable squid redirection rule in IPTables (post 80 redirection
to 3128 squid), the markings are maintained and packets route via
ISP1.

Now the big question is why is squid removing the marking ??
And how can this be prevented ??

Thx
Vai
Received on Thu May 14 2009 - 11:42:48 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 15 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT