Re: [squid-users] Squid - Not replace source IP address

From: casket88 <jamespeek_at_oldfields.com.au>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:18:03 -0700 (PDT)

Chris Robertson-2 wrote:
>
> casket88 wrote:
>> Amos Jeffries-2 wrote:
>>
>>> NP: Your word 'transparently redirected' appears to mean 'routed' in
>>> that
>>> paragraph. Please use the word 'transparent' less
>>> /rant.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The useage of the word "transparent" is in reference to the users, it is
>> transparent to them. Transparent is a good word, I think I'll use it
>> more.
>>
>
> Since it is transparent to your USERS, feel free to use the term
> "transparent" in your discourse with THEM. Since, from Squid's
> perspective, the traffic is INTERCEPTED, and ROUTED, you would be better
> off using those terms when addressing the Squid users mailing list. The
> key to effective communication is a common vocabulary.
>
> Then again, perhaps you are claiming your users are transparent, in
> which case you should disregard the previous paragraph.
>
>> Regardless, I will look in to TPROXY.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Chris
>
>
>

Well shit I apologise whole heartedly for my ignorance and lack of common
vocabulary.

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Squid---Not-replace-source-IP-address-tp24818364p24819160.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Wed Aug 05 2009 - 01:18:08 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 05 2009 - 12:00:03 MDT