Re: [squid-users] proxy: explicit & transparent + VideoCache

From: pavel kolodin <pavelkolodin_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:39:05 -0000

> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 07:18:41 -0000, "pavel kolodin"

>> Why?
>
> Possible reasons:
>
> 1) 302 being the status you really want to use for this.
>
> 2) "transparent proxy" aka "intercepting proxy" aka "man-in-middle
> attack"
> perhapse the plugin is smart enough to detect such attacks and prevent
> them
> from working.
>
> 3) perhapse the plugins is simply smart enough to realize it will never
> get
> a redirect back from the real source.
>
> 4) perhapse the browser does not have access to the new location.
>
> 5) perhapse the browser is limiting the sources the plugin may connect
> to.
> raw-IP addresses are known to be dangerous.

1) but VideoCache uses 303 by default. Why?

3) then why it redirects back from the real source with non-transparent?
4) access granted - i can access to http://10.10.10.1/... (new link
returned by VideoCache)
5) see 4)

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Thu Aug 06 2009 - 05:39:30 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 06 2009 - 12:00:03 MDT