Re: [squid-users] Hardware configuration for Squid that can handle 100 - 200 Mbps

From: George Herbert <george.herbert_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:43:18 -0700

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Paul Khadra<rmerheb_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wish to buy hardware for squid that can support internet traffic of 200
> Mbps. I have read a lot of documents on the forums but none has not got the
> best answer.
>
> 1- Shall I go to intel or opteron?
>
> 2- I can get 32GB memory but will 64 GB memory give an advatnage ?
>
> 3- I can get the HP DL38x series. They have 16 empty slots for hard disks. I
> can install 2 HD controllers. what is the best way to fill the harddisks
> bays and at the same time I want the best byte hit ratio? the harddisks
> options  are ( SAS 146GB,300GB or 450GB  at 15 Krpm or the SATA  250GB,
> 500GB or 1TB at 7200rpm).
> So assuming that budget is not a factor, and at 200 Mbps, will buying 16 x
> 500GB or 16 x 1TB disks have good affect on the hit ratio?
>
> Note: squid will be installed over solaris.

Do you plan to use Squid to cache traffic coming from outside destined
to your own servers, or traffic from inside which is going to outside
hosts?

If you're planning to cache outside traffic coming in, how big is your
website? How many files, how many big files, etc?

If you're planning to cache traffic going out to arbitrary sites - I
have 50 configured, 42-45 live dual processor dual core 2 GHz Opteron
Linux boxes and can do around 550 URLs/sec per server of external
traffic in test and do 350 URLs/sec during peak periods in production
across the farm, with 50% cache hit rates. If the URLs are 100k each
on average then that's around 440 megabits. The servers have 4 disks
- one root, one squid logs, two squid cache, with AUFS caches on the
two cache disks. 4 GB RAM.

-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert_at_gmail.com
Received on Thu Aug 27 2009 - 23:43:25 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 28 2009 - 12:00:03 MDT