Re: [squid-users] Squid HTTP 1.1 & Keep alive as reverse proxy

From: Ryan Chan <ryanchan404_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:13:46 +0800

Hello,

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Henrik Nordstrom
<henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net> wrote:
>...
> Correct.
>

Now I understood Squid is not 100% HTTP 1.1 complaints.

1. Why it that? Too hard to implement?
2. Which parts in the HTTP 1.1 are supported by Squid?

Thanks.
Received on Sat Sep 12 2009 - 10:13:54 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [squid-users] Squid HTTP 1.1 & Keep alive as reverse proxy"
Previous message: matteo cazzador: "Re: [squid-users] parent proxy https problem"
In reply to: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Squid HTTP 1.1 & Keep alive as reverse proxy"
Next in thread: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [squid-users] Squid HTTP 1.1 & Keep alive as reverse proxy"
Reply: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [squid-users] Squid HTTP 1.1 & Keep alive as reverse proxy"
Reply: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Squid HTTP 1.1 & Keep alive as reverse proxy"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 13 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT