Re: [squid-users] error: url_rewriter

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:14:50 +1300

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:33:58 -0400, Ross Kovelman
<rkovelman_at_gruskingroup.com> wrote:
> Sounds good, but what if this is for all sites? I was only testing
> Facbook,
> Myspace, CNN, etc. I did not go to you tube at all.
>
> Thanks

YouTube bit is irrelevant ...

>
>> From: Chudy Fernandez <chudy_fernandez_at_yahoo.com>
>> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
>> To: Ross Kovelman <rkovelman_at_gruskingroup.com>
>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] error: url_rewriter
>>
>> about the concurrency this will give you the idea.
>>
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent/YouTube/Discussion
>>

The better reference is:

http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Redirectors#How_do_I_make_it_concurrent.3F

>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Ross Kovelman <rkovelman_at_gruskingroup.com>
>>> To: Chudy Fernandez <chudy_fernandez_at_yahoo.com>;
>>> "squid-users_at_squid-cache.org" <squid-users_at_squid-cache.org>
>>> Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 12:21:57 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] error: url_rewriter
>>>
>>> This is what I have related to "children"
>>>
>>> redirect_children 1

The redirect_* options are obsolete. They are now re-named to
url_rewrite_*

That should now be "url_rewrite_children 1" though 5 is the default and
you may want to use that.

Amos

>>> auth_param basic children 5
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>> From: Chudy Fernandez
>>>> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
>>>> To: Ross Kovelman
>>>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] error: url_rewriter
>>>>
>>>> 2 ways to solve thats increase children or
>>>> change your rewriter to accept parallel and increase
>>>> concurrency.(which is
>>>> better)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>> From: Ross Kovelman
>>>>> To: "squid-users_at_squid-cache.org"
>>>>> Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 11:18:07 AM
>>>>> Subject: [squid-users] error: url_rewriter
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> I have an error showing:
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:41:05| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy.
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:41:05| WARNING: up to 1 pending requests queued
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:22| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy.
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:22| WARNING: up to 6 pending requests queued
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:22| Consider increasing the number of url_rewriter
>>>>> processes to at least 7 in your config file.
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:54| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy.
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:54| WARNING: up to 1 pending requests queued
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:54| Consider increasing the number of url_rewriter
>>>>> processes to at least 2 in your config file.
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:44:42| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy.
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:44:42| WARNING: up to 3 pending requests queued
>>>>> 2009/10/13 22:44:42| Consider increasing the number of url_rewriter
>>>>> processes to at least 4 in your config file.
>>>>> 2009/10/13 23:11:16| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy.
>>>>> 2009/10/13 23:11:16| WARNING: up to 1 pending requests queued
>>>>>
>>>>> How do I resolve this? I saw some things from the list and on other
>>>>> websites but those people had a lot more people accessing the server
>>>>> then I
>>>>> do. I am on squid 2.7
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Received on Wed Oct 14 2009 - 05:15:20 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Oct 14 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT