Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

From: Babu Chaliyath <babu.chaliyath_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:30:27 +0530

Hey Thanx Henrik,

And Amos,
Yes Definitely I can test them for sure.
I here to do any help I can offer

Regards
Babs

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> Babu Chaliyath wrote:
>>>
>>> Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees...
>>>
>>> The client info table had cacheClientAddressType added as .1,
>>> cacheClientAddress shuffled to .2
>>>  ... which bumped all cacheClient* from .N to .N+1
>>>
>>> The peering table had cachePeerIndex added as .1 and
>>> cacheClientAddressType
>>> added as .2
>>>  ... which bumped all cachePeer* from .N to .N+2
>>>
>>> Amos
>>
>> Now thats all going above my head as far as mrtg setup for the squid
>> 3.1 is concerned. Can U guys tell me where and what changes I need to
>> make it working?
>> Sorry for this but I couldnt get much idea from these.
>>
>> Regards
>> Babs
>
> Um, I think the best way to go forward is for us to fix this ASAP.
> Are you able to test patches if I do the code?
>
> Amos
> --
> Please be using
>  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE20
>  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.14
>
Received on Tue Nov 10 2009 - 18:00:38 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 10 2009 - 12:00:03 MST