Re: [squid-users] squid non-accel default website

From: Nils Hügelmann <nils_at_huegelmann.info>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 23:02:08 +0200

Hi Henrik,

thanks for the answer, a fallback feature for direct requests would be
great :-)

regards
nils

Am 12.05.2010 22:38, schrieb Henrik Nordström:
> tis 2010-05-11 klockan 17:04 +0200 skrev Nils Hügelmann:
>
>
>> At the current state, it shows an "invalid URL" ... "while trying to
>> retrieve the URL: /" error on direct access, which prevents using url
>> rewriters(and deny_info too?!) so how to do this?...
>>
> You can't.
>
> The reason is because Squid really need to know if an request is being
> proxied or accelerated as it have impact on how the request should be
> processed, and HTTP requires web servers (including accelerators) to
> also know how to process requests using full URL.
>
> Can't you move the proxy to a separate port, freeing up port 80 to be
> used as a web server?
>
> But yes, I guess we could add support for fallback mode when seeing an
> obvious webserver request on a proxy port instead of bailing out with
> invalid request.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
Received on Wed May 12 2010 - 21:02:01 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 13 2010 - 12:00:05 MDT