Re: [squid-users] never_direct/always_direct

From: Amos Jeffries <>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 23:23:34 +1200

GIGO . wrote:
> Dear all,
> never_direct/always_direct
> Why two directives had to be created while one directive could have done the trick? Please guide

Internal coding style for Squid is a bit limited for what these two are
supposed to do in relation to prefer_direct and cache_peer_access. The
features were evolved over a very long time period as well, so any hands
  made more of a mess.

Expect to see it change to something more coherent in some future release.


Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.3
Received on Mon May 17 2010 - 11:23:40 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 17 2010 - 12:00:05 MDT