Re: [squid-users] never_direct/always_direct

From: Peng, Jeff <pyh_at_l.nsbeta.info>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 19:25:29 +0800

2010/5/17 GIGO . <gigoz_at_msn.com>:
>
> Dear all,
>
> never_direct/always_direct
>
>
> Why two directives had to be created while one directive could have done the trick? Please guide
>
>

always_direct has priority over never_direct.

statement below:

always_direct allow A
never_direct allow B
always_direct deny C
never_direct allow D

is the same as:

always_direct allow A
always_direct deny C
never_direct allow B
never_direct allow D

-- 
Tech support agency in China
http://duxieweb.com/
Received on Mon May 17 2010 - 11:25:39 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 17 2010 - 12:00:05 MDT