Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7stable7 and ESPN3

From: Eric Vance <epvance_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:33:41 -0700

I have also had this issue. I was able to get the headers both going
through squid and not. I noticed a few key differences (but skip to
the end because I found the offending difference).

Request Header without Squid:

**************************************************************************************
GET http://broadband.espn.go.com/espn3/auth/userData?format=json&page=index
HTTP/1.1
Host: broadband.espn.go.com
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://espn.go.com/espn3/index
Accept: */*
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US)
AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
Cookie: SWID=C2085447-B5B5-4B68-9A02-97B9BEB8AC0C; userAB=C;
ESPN360beta=betaSet;
DE2=KioqOyoqKjtyZXNlcnZlZDticm9hZGJhbmQ7NTs0OzQ7MDswMDAuMDAwOzAwMDAuMDAwOzk5OTs1MzgzOzM0MDM7MDsqKjs=;
CRBLM=CBLM-001:; DS=PzswOz87; CRBLM_LAST_UPDATE=1291054796;
s_vi=[CS]v1|2679F7630516263D-60000198C0083F11[CE];
espnAffiliate=invalid;

s_pers=%20s_c24%3D1291061231070%7C1385669231070%3B%20s_c24_s%3DLess%2520than%25201%2520day%7C1291063031070%3B%20s_gpv_pn%3Despn3%253Ainvalid%253Aindex%7C1291063031109%3B
***************************************************************************************

Request header after Squid:

***************************************************************************************
GET /espn3/auth/userData?format=json&page=index
HTTP/1.0
Host: broadband.espn.go.com
Referer: http://espn.go.com/espn3/index
Accept: */*
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US)
AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.5
  17.44 Safari/534.7
Accept-Encoding: identity
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
Cookie: SWID=C2085447-B5B5-4B68-9A02-97B9BEB8AC0C; userAB=C;
ESPN360beta=betaSet;
DE2=KioqOyoqKjtyZXNlcnZlZDticm9hZGJhbmQ7NTs0OzQ7MDswMDAuMDAwOzAwMDAuMDAwOzk5OTs1MzgzOzM0MDM7MDsqKjs=;
CRBLM=CBLM-001:; DS=PzswOz87; CRBLM_LAST_UPDATE=1291054796;
s_vi=[CS]v1|2679F7630516263D-60000198C0083F11[CE];
espnAffiliate=invalid;
broadbandAccess=espn3-false%2Cnetworks-false;
s_pers=%20s_c24%3D1291092114183%7C1385700114183%3B%20s_c24_s%3DLess%2520than%25201%2520day%7C1291093914183%3B%20s_gpv_pn%3Despn3%253Ainvalid%253Aindex%7C1291093914212%3B;
lang=en; s_sess=%20s_cc%3Dtrue%3B%20s_omni_lid%3D%3B%20s_sq%3D%3B%20s_ppv%3D16%3B;
PREF=f2=8000000;
Via: 1.0 ph:3128 (squid/2.7.STABLE9)
X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1
Cache-Control: max-age=259200
Connection: keep-alive
***************************************************************************************

I manually issued this request changing one thing at a time until I
found the breaking item. When I removed this line from the Squid
version the response came back without the redirect (and I assume
would then work correctly):

X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1

So, I guess the questions are:
1. Is this line necessary?
2. Can it safely be removed?
3. How can it be removed?

Thanks,

Eric
Received on Tue Nov 30 2010 - 07:33:50 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 30 2010 - 12:00:03 MST