Re: [squid-users] proxy single sign-on

From: Go Wow <gowows_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 13:09:12 +0400

I thought squid with kerberos works like SSO, isnt it?

On 4 May 2011 11:48, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On 04/05/11 19:31, patrick.oeschger_at_bluewin.ch wrote:
>>
>> proxy (basic) authorization works well for the moment - so far so good...
>> i had a look at one of the commercial
>> products recently and they do some kind of single sign-on for their proxy
>> service
>> - the user will logon for the first
>> time with username/password
>> - a flash cookie (LSO - local stored object) will be set in the users
>> broswer with no
>> expiration time
>> - further authorizations (after browser was closed / machine restarted)
>> will be granted based on this
>> flash cookie
>>
>> i am in no way a squid/auth/flash guru...
>> has anyone tried a similar approach on squid?
>
> BlueCoat? (they seems to like this style of login).
>
>> it seems that
>> flash can be used to set various headers in the browser (if flash plugin
>> installed...)
>> so lets say the authentication
>> succeeds and flash will set the 'proxy-auth' header
>> ...will this header then be used in all subsequent browser
>> requests?
>
> Interesting question. Try it?
>
>>
>> a bit flash centric i know - pardon me ;D
>> /pat
>
> Not at all. We dearly need somebody with the will to try and see good
> proxy-auth methods documented for Flash, Java libraries, and quite a few
> other applications as well.
>
> Amos
> --
> Please be using
>  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12
>  Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.7 and 3.1.12.1
>
Received on Thu May 05 2011 - 09:09:26 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 05 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT