Re: [squid-users] Re: log message oddities -- what do they mean? how to interpret?

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:26:30 +1200

On 15/07/11 20:59, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> As documented this bundle had a lot of deep I/O and communication
>> architectural changes. Instability is/was expected.
>>
>> Most of the bugs you hit are now resolved in the daily update bundle.
>> If you need a relatively stable 3.2 release please use 3.2.0.8.
>
> ---
> I thought 3.2.0.9 was latest stable in that series...my bad.
>

No, that whole series is beta still. 3.2.1 will be the first stable. We
are ~25 major bugs and one more big feature merge away from that.

>> Squid-3.2 IPC is (wrongly) hard-coded to use PREFIX/var/run instead of
>> the system local state dir. We are in progress fixing that now.
>
> ----
> It doesn't use what's from 'configure'?
> Suse's config process uses a val of prefix=/usr, so
> it would have been trying to use '/usr/var/run', which would
> be a problem... ;-)
>

Yes. That. http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3267

>
> I could have resorted to backups, but wanted to work forward.
>
> Am working through several follow probs from my server distro
> upgrade (lots of consequential problems in refixing config stuff...)..
> So when I get back to a stable 'network', Maybe I'll try finding the
> 3.2.HEAD (am presuming that's what it would be called...)....

When you are ready. It is at

http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.2/ under the texts about "Daily
auto generated..."

or via rsync://squid-cache.org/source/squid-3.2 which is updated daily
with the bug fixes.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.14
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.9
Received on Fri Jul 15 2011 - 14:26:37 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 15 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT