Re: [squid-users] Squid beta is available

From: Amos Jeffries <>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 13:16:45 +1300

On 24/12/2011 12:15 p.m., Jenny Lee wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:38:58 +1300
>> From:
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid beta is available
>> On 24/12/2011 9:25 a.m., Saleh Madi wrote:
>>> Hi Amos,
>>> After I set the "memory_cache_shared off" in the config file of the squid
>>> , after I disable the memory_cache_shared , squid not crash, but we need
>>> shared memory caching, any fix for this problem.
>> Okay, did you find any other details about it? if you did please check
>> bugzilla to see if there is any known bugs mentioning those details.
> I believe it is this bug:
> or some of the related bugs mentioned there.
> Setting "cache_mem 0" fixes it as per Alex's suggestion.
> Which new beta feature are we talking about? did not have this issue. Is "memory_cache_shared" a new feature?

Yes. One of a few required for workers SMP caching.

> Since "cache_mem 0" fixed this, i did not pursue it further. But as OP mentioned above, he needs this shared memory feature.
> I honestly think development should be focused on fixing existing issues at this stage instead of introducing additional ones at every release. Of course you might disagree as developers, however, this is quite frustrating for us as users.

We are. The bunch of SMP caching features in was the last
feature additions for 3.2. Now we have only to fix the bugs.

Received on Sat Dec 24 2011 - 00:17:00 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Dec 24 2011 - 12:00:02 MST