Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.2.3 RPM available

From: Eliezer Croitoru <>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:01:17 +0200

On 11/19/2012 1:46 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Aha. Very good example of why people should not post build errors etc on
> the users mailing list. I'm pretty much the only core developer reading
> this list and when I'm away or too busy for the list (like 10-30 Aug
> 2012) reports get lost. I try to catch up but have to go through them
> quickly and there are 621 threads still to be read and dealt with in my
> mailbox right now.
> /rant :-)
> As for the build problem. Yes it is a minor flaw in Squid which is
> highlighted by the recent stricter GCC versions. FYI; we have managed to
> get Coverity Scan running again on the Squid-3 code and this months
> focus is on a deep polish fixing lots of little missing checks like
> this. 3.3 and 3.2 will have this patch soonish:
> Amos
Hoo now I understood why and what happen with my post.
I will check it later this month to make sure if this error is still exits.
I have seen these posts about Coverity and it's very good to have more
checks in place.

What I was thinking is that if I do not get the errors in regular
compilation it's not really an issue for installation and operation
which most Centos users are care for.
And also Centos repos has only 3.1 RPM which makes Centos "the distro
which dosnt upgrade squid".

621?? I hope it's not only from squid..
I just noticed that I got some timeout issue from my smtp relay server
as it states you personal mail server was out of reach for the last
couple days.(or it was the last error it got)

I had a question for you about sockets stuff (related to TPORXY but it's
for hobby so later next week.


Eliezer Croitoru
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer <at>
Received on Mon Nov 19 2012 - 00:01:26 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 19 2012 - 12:00:04 MST