Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.2: squid -z forking?

From: Silamael <Silamael_at_coronamundi.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:09:16 +0100

On 02/06/2013 02:05 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Partially. The parent returning immediately is not agood thing. BUT,
> "squid -z ; squid" is not a good way to do things even if it did. If
> that were possible we would simply have made squid startup perform the
> -z operations by default.
>
> squid -z is a create operation pure and simple. The manual way to create
> directories before the *first* time you run Squid.
>
> squid -z will create missing directories. BUT, does not ensure they are
> valid if already existing.
> Also, for some storage types they will create by destroying existing
> content. That was a bug and we are working on the fix.

Hi Amos!

Will this fix or another one include that the parent process does not
return until the cache initialization is done?
Or is the said fix just addressing the problem that the initialization
would destroy the already existing cache in certain cases?

-- Matthias
Received on Wed Feb 06 2013 - 07:09:24 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 06 2013 - 12:00:03 MST