On Sat, 18 May 2013 01:27:36 +0800
csn233 <csn233_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:09 AM, csn233 <csn233_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I didn't bother spending any more time on it.
> >>
> >> ufdbGuard is a more powerful substitute of squidGuard.
> >> Has regular updates and even free support.
> >>
> >> Marcus
>
> Sure. You forgot to mention though, squidGuard is free whereas
> ufdbGuard is a licensed product.
>
> Small point I know, but relevant.
>
^ You guys crack me up.
-
Signed,
Fix Nichols
http://www.squidblacklist.org
Received on Fri May 17 2013 - 18:10:57 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 18 2013 - 12:00:17 MDT