Re: [squid-users] what are the Pros and cons filtering urls using squid.conf?

From: Squidblacklist <webmaster_at_squidblacklist.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 09:14:37 -0700

On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:59:54 -0600
Alex Rousskov <rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com> wrote:

> On 06/09/2013 03:29 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>
> > Would you prefer a filtering based on a reload or a persistent DB
> > like mongoDB or tokyo tyrant?
>
> I would prefer to improve Squid so that reconfiguration has no
> disrupting effects on traffic, eliminating the "reload is disruptive
> for Squid but not for my ICAP service" difference.
>
> There are many important differences between ACL lists, eCAP adapters,
> and ICAP services. Reconfiguration handling should not be one of them.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alex.
>
>

This should be easily achieved by simply spawning a second squid
process. to temporarily handle the traffic while the primary squid is
reloading the conf.

Similar to how it works if you had a parent proxy that was reloading,
the sibling ignores it and bypasses it until it returns to normal
operation.

Im not a programmer, ive no idea how the devels would implement it, but
thats an idea.

Signed,

Fix Nichols

http://www.squidblacklist.org
Received on Sun Jun 09 2013 - 16:15:15 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 09 2013 - 12:00:04 MDT