Re: [squid-users] Re: Responses to squidclient and browser are different

From: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer_at_ngtech.co.il>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 19:19:48 +0200

OK so this site seems like it is indeed cache friendly while based in
wordpress and some other dynamic content system.

Well it would seems reasonable for only the front pages to be dynamic.

So the default settings of squid for this site should be OK and a
reload-into-ims will be a reasonable addition.

It has couple domains related to wordpress and thumbnails.
Crawling with redbot at the pages should show the basic analytics about
the site.

Eliezer

On 07/12/13 14:57, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Oh but it is cache friendly.
> * the main display HTML is cacheable for 5 minutes, but with revalidation.
> * the embeded objects and articles are cacheable for 365 days.
>
> Which for news seems reasonable, you want to see the latest as it
> happens right? but the objects displayed dont change much, just their
> arrangement.
>
> The Vary:Cookie seems odd, most likely somebody screwed up in their auth
> design somewhere.
>
> PS. Mango's "very long" caching time is actually shortening the time
> most the objects on that site would otherwise cache for.:-(
>
> Amos
Received on Sat Dec 07 2013 - 17:25:16 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Dec 08 2013 - 12:00:03 MST