Re: [squid-users] Re: Responses to squidclient and browser are different

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 01:57:29 +1300

On 7/12/2013 4:06 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Hey Mangpo,
>
> On 07/12/13 04:37, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> >
>>> >Anyway, is there anyway to ignore this Vary header?
>> Why dont you just use the wget tool to take a snapshot of the website as
>> it is right now and serve that up to your visitors for the next 6 days?
> If you want you can use ICAP to do that and which I do not think it's a
> good idea.
>
> Some ISPs in the world have tried the approach of serving stale content
> and the result was indeed less bandwidth but also less clients.
>
> If your clients do want to access this specific site and it is not
> giving the client any way to LOGIN and access content by login I would
> say that it's a site which like serving dynamic content faster then the
> speed of it happening and which I would not even would like to read it.
> If some people do like reading this site and do not have problem reading
> it this fast I do not see any right way to cache or not cache them.
>
> I have not seen a human that can look at the news in this site and read
> it in the speed it's being updated.
> In a case it's a site for Computing Systems to "read" I really don't
> think you would like to block their speed in the LAN since most
> operators of these systems will probably know it fast enough.
>
> I do remember that RSS is based on http and most RSS feeds are very very
> very very cache friendly.
> This site should be cache friendly while the admins do not think so..

Oh but it is cache friendly.
 * the main display HTML is cacheable for 5 minutes, but with revalidation.
 * the embeded objects and articles are cacheable for 365 days.

 Which for news seems reasonable, you want to see the latest as it
happens right? but the objects displayed dont change much, just their
arrangement.

The Vary:Cookie seems odd, most likely somebody screwed up in their auth
design somewhere.

PS. Mango's "very long" caching time is actually shortening the time
most the objects on that site woudl otherwise cache for. :-(

Amos
Received on Sat Dec 07 2013 - 12:57:35 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Dec 07 2013 - 12:00:04 MST