Re: [squid-users] Re: in-transit objects and more new requests for them

From: mohamad pen <mohammad.basu_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:25:52 +0330

On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Francesco Chemolli <gkinkie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 14 Dec 2013, at 16:00, mohamad pen <mohammad.basu_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> greeting every one.
>> I did some experiments on on both squid 2.7 and squid HEAD.bazaar
>> (from launch pad) which both have claimed to support collapsed
>> forwarding (ability to create on connection to origin for every
>> in-transit instances of a url) and none of em doing it right!!! the
>> squid 2.7 (with collapsed_forwarding on) is claimed to support it
>> from the squid's main site
>> (http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/collapsed_forwarding/)
>
> Hello Mohamad,
> what branch did you try from launchpad? Is it trunk or the one which was suggested by Amos?
> In what ways are your expectations not met? You are not saying that squid doesn't support what you ask for, but that it's not doing it right. What is "right" for you?
>
> Kinkie

Hi francesco
the launchpad branch was the one suggested by Amos. the trunk version
does not claim to support collapsed-forwarding.
actually I meant it is not supporting it while it is claimed to
support it at least in 2.6 and 2.7 stable versions and because of that
I said it is not doing it right. it creates different connections for
every requests to static files to origin url while
collapsed-forwarding guarantees just one connection for every requests
for in-transit instance.
I also came with my experience's headers to show my work on it

mohamad
Received on Sun Dec 15 2013 - 14:56:11 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Dec 16 2013 - 12:00:06 MST