Re: Next Squid version

On Sat, Jun 03, 2000, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Duane Wessels wrote:
>
> > My concern is the amount of changes occuring recently. The more beasts
> > we kill (commloops, deferred reads, pump, etc) , the longer it will be
> > until the next version becomes stable again.
>
> Agreed.
>
> My suggestion is to start a feature freeze of Squid-2.4 soon. But before
> that I'd like to commit the policy changes currently in final testing.
>
> Squid-2.4 todo list:
>
> * Policy changes/modularization
> * Memory usage optimizations (basically field size adjustments)
> * Bug fixes
>
> Suggestions for Squid-2.5:
>
> * commloops and comm_read/write optimizations
> * reworked request flow
> * clean up the hot object cache
> * Kill pump.c
> * possibly split the store per cache_dir.
> * NTLM authorization
> * SSL gatewaying
> * Transfer Encoding
> * Further memory usage optimizations by seriously considering what needs
> to be kept in memory

I'll agree to that. Good suggestion.

Adrian

-- 
Adrian Chadd			Build a man a fire, and he's warm for the
<adrian@creative.net.au>	rest of the evening. Set a man on fire and
				he's warm for the rest of his life.