Re: MemPools rewrite

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:49:05 -0700 (MST)

On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> However, for the reiserfs_raw (aka butterfly) store, as there is
> no in-core index at all there is a farily big penalty for misses
> in querying the disk storage to see if it could be a hit..

I would think they would want to use a cache digest or similar small,
lossy hash to check for potential hits with high-enough probability...

Alex.
Received on Wed Nov 01 2000 - 15:49:08 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:54 MST