Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I'm all for it. I'd like to throw in some entries for equipment
> sponsorship, rather than "feature/duration" ..
Equipment can be seen as one form of feature ;-)
I want each entry to somehow indicate how comitted the sponsor is, but
without having to classify them in different levels. But at the same
time I do not want the list to go into too much detail.. I don't think
it should list exacly how they have sponsored the development, more why.
/Henrik
Received on Wed Jan 03 2001 - 15:25:43 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:09 MST