Re: storeGet() -> storeGetPublic() ?

Robert Collins wrote:
>
> perhaps provide a set of routines that allow a fs to build a in memory index, then something like reiserFS could optionally pass all
> additions/purges through those routines, thus generating a in memory index - and then digest capability. Yes for reiser it's
> additional code with no purpose but creating digests, but on the other hand it'd be very modular and thus easy to #define on or off
> for the cache administrator to choose...

Naa.. that would invalidate the whole concept of how reiserfs_raw is
designed (the FS keeps the index, not the application), and is
non-trivial to implement there as Squid has no clue about deletetions
(happens automagically in the kernel-FS when needed)

/Henrik
Received on Sun Jan 07 2001 - 04:59:24 MST