RE: licencing and modules

> Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
>
> > I don't think that would be wise.
> > Most of the times leaving issues pending is worse than having them
> > solved the wrong way, and this is one of those times IMO.
>
> True, but widening the licencing permissions technically requires
> cooperation from the main copyright holder, which in this
> case does not
> have any relation to the developer group.

True.
However, my take is that we are _not_ changing the licensing permissions,
just clarifying what _we_ as developers mean by some of the wording in
them.
However, as Duane says in another message, the point is going to be
moot pretty soon :-)

-- 
	/kinkie