RE: -O vs -O2, revisited

> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 09, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > > If you look you will find the magic (which is no magic at
> all when you
> > > see it). Search for 2.95.
> >
> > Hrm. The code disables -O completely. I've not had a problem with
> > -O under gcc .. is there a reason why the magic completely
> > disables optimisation?
>
> No idea.
>
> I never had problems with -O2 either, but then I am mostly using the
> RedHat 6.2 egcs compiler..

I have seen weird cases of stack corruption.

-- 
	/kinkie