Re: squid-2.5 ipv6 --- dead code or WIP?

From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:56:49 -0800

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:50:38PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:

> Yes, there is interest - mainly in getting it ported to 3.0.

Fair 'nuf. 2.5 crashes at times anyhow :)

> I think it could be merged into the mainline immediately post 3.0
> going PRE-release. (which is when we'll make a development branch to
> stabilise 3.0 on.

What about differences in configuration syntax and the arguably
somewhat ugly IN_ADDR abstraction? Right now there are some ipv4
centric ideas... since only a small percentage of people will
actually use IPv6 presumably, we don't want to force everyone to
change ther configuration syntax (things like 0.0.0.0 -> ::) and also
need to think about how best to deal with ACLs intelligently...

  --cw
Received on Tue Feb 04 2003 - 19:56:53 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:19:13 MST