Re: remove deferred reads

On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 00:26, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Only one thing... but I guess this is mostly a question to Adrian:
>
> + *
> + * NOTE: COMM_ERR_CLOSING will NOT be called for CommReads' sitting in
> a
> + * DeferredReadManager.
> */
>
>
> makes me further question the need and value of COMM_ERR_CLOSING...
>
>
> What is the intention behind COMM_ERR_CLOSING? What is it supposed to
> fix which cannot be fixed by not calling the callback and instead make
> use of the close callback?

Adrian and I discussed this - [we|he]'ll be removing COMM_ERR_CLOSING as
part of a post-deferred reads removal comms review.

I've still got a few comms quirks to track down, so it's even odds who
gets there first :].

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.