On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:20:27 +0200 (CEST)
  Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
> 
>> my %hits = ('TCP_HIT' => 1,
>>            'TCP_REFRESH_HIT' => 1,
>>
>> TCP_REFRESH_HIT is  thing that had bytes to be downloaded from the 
>>origin 
>> server due to  not misses, but  good or wrong will of  the origin 
>>server
> 
> ???
> 
> A TCP_REFRESH_HIT had a very small 304 response sent by the server, 
>and the actual content sent from cache.
> 
> To get the statistics fully correct about 100 bytes or so should be 
>added to the cache miss byte statistics for each TCP_REFRESH_HIT, 
>with the TCP_REFRESH_HIT as such counted as a cache hit.
Is it the same Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org> that  wrote 
under subject "Re: How squid caches some things":
------8<---------------------------------------------
1129493582.720 2000 127.0.0.1 TCP_REFRESH_HIT/200 455 GET 
http://images.rambler.ru/m3/w/l-i-Flagged.gif evg
[.....]
And what do you want Squid to do in this case?
What the client asked was:
   Please give me this URL (GET ...), and it must be a fresh copy not
   some possibly stale cached copy (Pragma: no-cache). I do not have
   a local copy of the object in my cache so please give me the object
   even if it hasn't changed in ages (no If-Modified-Since or 
If-None-Match
   header).
------8<---------------------------------------------
SY,
Evgeny Kotsuba
Received on Wed Oct 19 2005 - 02:26:24 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 12:00:07 MST