Re: squid-2.5 related work

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:12:34 +0800

On Fri, Apr 14, 2006, Robert Collins wrote:

> > But being able to do temporarily disconnected versioned work without
> > having to worry about resyncing does feel tempting, so maybe it's time
> > to start looking for an alternative to CVS.
>
> bzr 0.8 in beta now fixes many of the issues bazaar 1 [aka arch] had.
>
> Specifically - there is no extra namespace, you just work with branches
> at urls - equivalent to just having multiple CVS trees on disk, but with
> disconnected work built in. It also solves the 'shared repositories are
> hard' aspects of arch, and includes a drop-in replacement mode for CVS
> users.
>
> Yes, proslytising a little here.

Heh. I'm working with a couple of the monotone developers and they
spent much time explaining how monotone would work well in the squid
development environment.

So, how about squid-2.5 development? People want it!

Adrian
Received on Fri Apr 14 2006 - 07:13:54 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon May 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT