Re: inline the ICAP Makefile ?

From: Robert Collins <robertc@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 08:51:58 +1000

On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 14:39 -0600, Duane Wessels wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > Duane, how do you feel about me inlining the ICAP Makefile into the src
> > Makefile ? It makes it easier for automake to track dependencies,
> > particular when building individual files - less recursion etc.
>
> Um, I guess. I certainly don't have a strong enough opinion to stop it.
>
> Sometimes its nice to run make from a subdir and
> not have to worry about wasting time compiling other junk.

Yes, I can understand this. Assuming I do this, 'cd src && make
ICAP/libicap.a' will make just whats needed for libicap.a.

> In general I think the source tree needs more subdirs, but I care less
> about how the makefiles work.

I agree too - one for acls, one for the store, one for the event loop -
are currently in my consciousness

> So you also plan to do away with libicap.a?

Not at all. Libraries are great abstraction points for grouping
functionality. We can remove it if you want to, but I had not intention
of doing so.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

Received on Tue May 02 2006 - 16:52:34 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MDT