Re: bug 1208: internal redirect

From: Tsantilas Christos <chtsanti@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:26:16 +0200

Hi Amos,

Amos Jeffries wrote:
>........................................ There are other
> reasons, but disagreement on actually making an architecture appears to me
> to be one of the big ones.

As I can understand the major disagreement has to do with AsyncCalls.
Squid3 has architecture and AsyncCalls are not change the squid3
architecture (or change a small part of the architecture) they just
execute the same thinks with a different way.....

The true is that I started 3-4 times to write a mail which explains the
benefits of AsyncCalls using examples but this mail never ends. Again
today I started writing something but I am too tired to continue....

I am feeling if we start a discussion about architecture this will never
end (like my mail explaining AsyncCalls) and the squid3.1 will be
released after 5 or 6 years.

I am going to sleep. Good evening to all .....
(Yes, yes I know all these thinks about the south and north hemisphere
and the difference in hours etc... anyway....)
Received on Mon Jan 21 2008 - 16:26:47 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jan 30 2008 - 12:00:09 MST