Re: Dynamic content policy update

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:56:15 +1300

Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> I'm for it. Henrik suggested just "." (ie, everything) rather than
>>> specifically doing cgi-bin and ? URLs; is there any particular reason
>>> to have different "." vs "(cgi-bin|\?)" refresh pattern lines?
>> Well, I for one was keeping it seperate since there is already a
>> refresh_pattern for '.' and it has non-zero entries for some values.
>>
>> To keep with the RFC as Mark pointed out it MUST have default "0 0% 0"
>> for dynamics, other GET/HEAD/POST are not so restricted for their defaults.
>>
>> Not a strong reason really to keep the default from being "0 0% 0". If
>> others support the default idea then let it be so.
>
> Good enough for me. What do others think?
>

Done. Applied for 3.0 and 3-HEAD.

Amos

-- 
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.
Received on Tue Feb 05 2008 - 23:56:09 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 12:00:09 MST