Re: monitoring bugzilla changes

On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 23:36 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> ons 2008-04-02 klockan 15:12 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
>
> > I may be missing something(*), but I think it would be better if
> > squid-dev was subscribed to bugzilla OR squid-bugs allowed folks to add
> > and remove themselves (but not post). The former will make discussing
> > bugs easier, but will move discussion away from bug reports unless there
> > is some glue to back-post from squid-dev to bugzilla (which has its own
> > problems). A read-only public list may be a better alternative.
>
> squid-bugs is closed only because it's also used as contact address for
> security related issues where bugzilla should not be used.
>
> I think the best is to set up a new address for security issues, open
> squid-bugs to subscription and change squid-bugs to direct replies to
> squid-dev like how squid-cvs is configured.
>
> I do not want to overload squid-dev with all the bugzilla chatter, but
> fully agree that these should be open.

The scheme you outlined above is perfect.

Alex.
Received on Wed Apr 02 2008 - 15:51:20 MDT