Re: 2.7stable1 ?

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 11:28:47 +1000

The only things that gave me pause (note past tense);

* 2.7 implements stale-while-revalidate and stale-if-error. Recently
Roy F gave some feedback that he'd prefer shorter names; others
disagreed. I was thinking we might change them, but aren't convinced
it's necessary at this point. Unless squid-dev would also like shorter
names (anybody?), I'll keep the drafts as-is.

* I submitted a patch in <http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2345
> that the Flickr guys find useful. It would be nice to have it in
STABLE1, but I'm happy to continue applying it separately for the time
being...

That said, I think it's ready for release.

On 19/05/2008, at 3:06 AM, Kinkie wrote:

> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Adrian Chadd
> <adrian_at_creative.net.au> wrote:
>> Does anyone have any objections to 2.7.STABLE1 being released?
>> Henrik, would you mind kicking this off? I'm still not comfortable
>
> No objections here.
>
> --
> /kinkie

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com
Received on Mon May 19 2008 - 01:29:58 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Aug 05 2008 - 01:06:35 MDT