On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 09:29 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On sön, 2008-09-14 at 16:32 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
> > This is probably too vague of a statement/problem to argue about. I find
> > the current code easier to debug, especially when new style of callbacks
> > is used, because cache.log contains more structured information.
> >
> > I also need to polish and publish scripts that track/isolate a given
> > transaction based on logged async calls.
>
> Yes, the AsyncCall logging is indeed easier to debug, but it's harder to
> analyze a post-mortem crash from a core dump where you can not easily
> reproduce the problem.
>
> What's primarily needed to remove this concern is to somehow dump the
> origin where the current live call was scheduled, to be included in
> the cache.log crash messages.
OK. This is now filed as
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2463
Alex.
Received on Mon Sep 15 2008 - 14:02:44 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Sep 15 2008 - 12:00:05 MDT