Re: SourceLayout and adaptation/esi

From: Amos Jeffries <>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:17:09 +1300

Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Hi Amos,
> I am working on the adaptation-related SourceLayout changes this
> week. I have updated the wiki page. The adaptation directories on the
> wiki page do not reflect the last consensus regarding moving icap and
> ecap inside adaptation/, but that is OK. I will update the wiki page if
> my changes (based on that consensus) are approved.
> src/adaptation/
> src/adaptation/icap
> src/adaptation/ecap
> Do ESI files belong to adaptation/esi even though they do not use common
> adaptation interfaces or even the same vectoring points? It feels like
> we should leave ESI out of adaptation/ for now, but I am not sure. What
> do you think?

I've always felt that ESI should be in the same broad group as eCAP and

It may mean adding ClientStreams in with Adaptation, but that sort of
fits as well. Since they are both content-alteration features.

> If I make good progress, I will add more (and more critical) directories
> to my to-do. I still hope we can finish most of the restructuring by the
> end of the month.
> Thank you,
> Alex.


Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13
   Current Beta Squid
Received on Wed Feb 18 2009 - 08:17:00 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 18 2009 - 12:00:03 MST