Re: [RFC] Squid 3.1 ports

From: Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:35:48 +0100

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>
> Opinions please.
>
> There are three relatively large alterations in 3.2 which I'm undecided
> about whether to port to 3.1.
>
>  r11497 Henrik - Disable OpenSSL SSL/TLS Bug #workarounds by default
>
>  r11495 Henrik - Send DNS A and AAAA queries in parallel
>
>  r11494 Christos - trimMemory for unswappable objects
>
> Their full diff can be found in the "not yet merged" section of
>  http://master.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.2/changesets/merge.html
>
> To me they all seem important, but are large enough that worrying about
> problems for the stable series also seems prudent.
>
> Does anyone think there is sufficient need to port any of these to 3.1? this
> weekends release or a few months away?

Hi,
   I'm for merging r11497, undecided about 11494 and against 11495:
the latter is essentially a performance improrovement, while the
former are arguably security issues.
I'd rather spend the time working on 3.2.

-- 
    /kinkie
Received on Wed Feb 01 2012 - 08:35:54 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 01 2012 - 12:00:09 MST