Believability of elapsed times recorded in access.log?

From: Steve Davies <steve@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 12:05:51 +0200 (GMT+0200)

Hi,

How believable are the elapsed time figures shown on TCP_HIT and TCP_MISS
records logged to access.log? The times seem pretty short, particularly
for TCP_HITs on small objects.

I'm guessing that data spends some unmeasured time in the TCP/IP
subsystem.

Regards,
Steve Davies
Received on Sat Sep 28 1996 - 03:06:01 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jens Elkner: "Re: Calculating average speed of sends to proxy users"
Previous message: Duane Wessels: "on travel..."
Next in thread: Richard Huveneers: "Re: Believability of elapsed times recorded in access.log?"
Reply: Richard Huveneers: "Re: Believability of elapsed times recorded in access.log?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:05 MST