Re: Believability of elapsed times recorded in access.log?

From: Richard Huveneers <>
Date: 28 Sep 1996 14:14:48 GMT

In article <>, steve@iafrica.COM (Steve Davies) writes:
>How believable are the elapsed time figures shown on TCP_HIT and TCP_MISS
>records logged to access.log? The times seem pretty short, particularly
>for TCP_HITs on small objects.

I commented on this a while back. You might want to scan the list archive,
although I don't remember the 'Subject' anymore.

Anyway, there are two issues to consider: the time to flush the TCP buffer is
not taken into account and simultaneous connections must be corrected for.

Regards, Richard.
Received on Sat Sep 28 1996 - 11:39:44 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:05 MST